Discuz! Board

 Forgot Password
 Register now
Search
Hot Search: Activity Personals discuz
View: 5047|Reply: 5
Print Previous Topic Next Topic

Feedback about users' suggestions

[Copy Link]

11

Threads

52

Posts

443

Credits

Administrator

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
443
Jump to the specified floor
Landlord
Posted at 2020-11-28 18:10:15 | Only Author Replies reward |Positive sequence Browse |Read mode
1. The circle purge tower and tree supports are the main thing to look into I think
Our answer: Thanks for your suggestion, yes we now are testing the circle purge tower, will update to you soon. And the tree supports may be not suitable for PVA materials, the support is easy to be rupture,but we will continue testing and share with you.

Reply

Use props Report

11

Threads

52

Posts

443

Credits

Administrator

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
443
6#
 Author| Posted at 2020-12-1 10:54:12 | Only Author
Hi there,here is for our feedback about users' suggestions on dual extruder 3d printer,welcome to share your ideas!
Reply Support Opposition

Use props Report

11

Threads

52

Posts

443

Credits

Administrator

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
443
5#
 Author| Posted at 2020-12-1 10:51:15 | Only Author
MikeK Posted at 2020-11-29 03:05
Tree supports are working fine for me with PVA. You just need to lower your support printing speed,  ...

When we testing PVA support, it is easy to break in three places:
1 For the first layer, if the RAFT base is used, the adhesion between PVA and PLA is not good, so the support is likely to fall off.
2 In the middle, if print the tree support, it is easy to break. According to what you said, reducing the speed and increasing the wall thickness and filling will improve.
3 Support the contact part of the entity. The same problem is the viscosity of the two materials. Generally, we produce a surface as the contact entity.
Reply Support Opposition

Use props Report

0

Threads

2

Posts

16

Credits

Newbie Member

Rank: 1

Credits
16
Floor
Posted at 2020-11-30 20:03:51 | Only Author
Speaking of direct drive, it helps a lot with PVA also. And I'd assume it would be way easier to remove just the entire 3d printer assembly with extruder, motor, hot end and all at once with direct drive.

Please let me know if you'd like any assistance with the direct drive testing or design.


If you're worried about weight on the X, use a pancake stepper motor instead with a BMG extruder for torque multiplication.
2 BMGs with 2 pancake motors weighs less than a 310x310x4mm plate of glass most people run on big printers bed.
Reply Support Opposition

Use props Report

11

Threads

52

Posts

443

Credits

Administrator

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
443
Bench
 Author| Posted at 2020-11-30 15:35:54 | Only Author
2.Direct drive is more reliable than bowden with less wear parts。All metal hot ends for no degrading of PTFE tubes。wire holders to prevent snagging
Answer:Yes you are right,direct drive has many advantages,the reasons we didn't choose are:
1.We want to make a module design printer which can be expanded to other functions,reducing the replacement of parts,bowden drive is more convenient to replace parts when you need use another function.
2.Bowden drive can make the extruder lighter,moving faster.
3.But at the same time we will spend time to test derect drive.
Reply Support Opposition

Use props Report

0

Threads

2

Posts

16

Credits

Newbie Member

Rank: 1

Credits
16
Sofa
Posted at 2020-11-29 03:05:23 | Only Author
Last edited by MikeK In 2020-11-29 03:21 Editor

Tree supports are working fine for me with PVA. You just need to lower your support printing speed, adding some infill to the trees helps too (about 3-5% lines), you can also increase the walls of the tree from 1 to 2 and that helps quite a bit.
Reply Support Opposition

Use props Report

You need to log in before you can reply Login | Register now

This forum Credits Rules

Archiver|Mobile ver.|Darkroom|enbbs.makerpi3d.com

GMT+8, 2024-12-22 16:50 , Processed in 0.117969 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3 English ver.

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

Quick Reply Back to top Back to list